Diddy
愛してるって 言わなきゃ殺す
And put all the Swedish ones in one heat just for shits and giggles
A ?? should never be a 5 (or any other score), unfair.Just make a ?? equal to a 05. It isn't overly punishing or rewarding, but it means that things can't be averaged into a weird place.
How is it unfair?A ?? should never be a 5 (or any other score), unfair.
Because you're scoring a song you don't even know, that makes no sense to me.How is it unfair?
Because you're scoring a song you don't even know, that making no sense to me.
How would you deal with a ?? then. Assuming it to be 00 is still giving it a score, and averaging it means that if say, only two people have heard it (and say give it 10) then that would be unfair too.Because you're scoring a song you don't even know, that makes no sense to me.
Oh I would only accept votes where you score them all, if you're not gonna listen to the songs why bothering voting? It's like entering ASFM but not bothering with some songs. Just my opinion.How would you deal with a ?? then. Assuming it to be 00 is still giving it a score, and averaging it means that if say, only two people have heard it (and say give it 10) then that would be unfair too.
Giving it the middle score is the least worst option, I would argue, if you aren't forcing every voter to rank every song.
Please!i might just drop a list and let BT deal with it
I'm pretty sure some songs are obscure enough that lucky if 2 people know them, but I'm sure there are enough posters willing to listen and rate them. And you can always do a "a song has to be ranked at least by X people or won't qualify". That's more fair than giving random points, from my point of view.But the problem is if some obscure song gets a couple of high marks and nobody else knows it
I disagree with this completely. It cheapens the act of giving the disgustingly French ballad that @Soldi sent 0. 0 should really be a punishment, not a default.I’ll be taking each ?? As a 0, or politely asking the sender to go home, listen to each song, send me a complete list and then think about what they did and how they can grow as a person after living through it.
I agree with the “obscure song that only a few people have heard” argument. The problem here is that it may be that one whole batch of songs gets 30 sets of votes and another whole batch only gets 15 so they’re being disproportionately awarded/punished depending on what the arbitrary score is.How would you deal with a ?? then. Assuming it to be 00 is still giving it a score, and averaging it means that if say, only two people have heard it (and say give it 10) then that would be unfair too.
Giving it the middle score is the least worst option, I would argue, if you aren't forcing every voter to rank every song.
That's an editorial decision though (and I like it). I contend that 5 is the most neutral option.On my ABBA Rate I’m doing a “??” as an average minus one so it’s penalised slightly if it’s not well known but not disproportionately.
Yes, obviously. Because a 5 is a , a 10 is a and a 0 is aBut you're willing to give them FIVE points with a ??
Yes this. It’s just that more people will inevitably watch some weeks than others so some songs will kind of get “??” by default if it’s being done as a rate from the start.Why would we be scoring songs with ??
We'll all be watching/listening to them so we should be able to give out proper marks.
They’d better be!!Please help me with this, songs from 2020 national finals are not ok?
I've nominated some 2020 ones and they've been accepted.Please help me with this, songs from 2020 national finals are not ok?
Yeah, 2020 is fine as long as it’s not the actual winning entries.Please help me with this, songs from 2020 national finals are not ok?
This is the equalising nature of the viewing galas, EVERYONE will have access to these songs and will be rating on quality as opposed to name recognition.But the problem is if some obscure song gets a couple of high marks and nobody else knows it, it’ll get through just because of a few stans.
I mean if ?? = 5 is controversial, I think points is better. If not enough people listen, then it won’t go through
If you like that then you’ll go CRAZY for this:For what it’s worth, as someone who might vote in the final 100 but probably not for 350 songs, I like Pingu’s idea of ?? being the average-1
You'll have to wait and seeI'm here for this Sunday.
Any Hebrew aerobics this weekend?