straightorbroken
User
- Joined
- Jul 27, 2011
- Messages
- 41,661
I don't get it. Is it an attempt at a Daniel Radcliffe diss?
I don't get it. Is it an attempt at a Daniel Radcliffe diss?
Seems like it - or an all three Harry Potter leads diss?
View attachment 34534
New Rowling bigotry just dropped.
That's fucking VILE.View attachment 34534
New Rowling bigotry just dropped.
Patiently awaiting her to go full Nazi salute so that Twitter can .... say she was just throwing her heart to the fans and ask for just ONE example of her being even a little bit fascist
As incredibly frustrating as it is this is completely true.This is why people as disordered as her acquire so much wealth - it puts them above consequences. There is nothing that anyone can do to her that has any impact on her life. If no-one buys another book, makes another programme or stocks another sweatshop t-shirt, she is still a billionaire.
We should chip in and buy her a gravestone that just has the inscription "So What?".
Oh 100%. We can see on a smaller scale Trump supporters, Brexiteers. "Let's create an imaginary boogeyman(immigrants, transgender men and women, muslims) who is response for all of our problems. And latch ourselves onto a high profile figure who will champion our cause."I just do not believe you behave like she does if you’re a fundamentally happy person though.
Same with Musk. Incredible wealth, legally untouchable. But he’s a miserable, paranoid, drug-addled weirdo with no apparent friends and a family that openly loathes him. There’s no amount of money that would make me want his life.
Personally I'm for sticking them in a swimming pool and deleting the stepsWe should lock JK in a room with Andrew Tate, given that they're basically the same person.
Yet the first one will still be GlinnerI saw someone say we should put ten terfs in a room and tell them one of them is trans and they'll eventually just kill each other.