.The long anticipated appeals court ruling is expected to address three issues: (1) whether former US District Court Judge Vaughn Walker should have recused himself from hearing the case because he is gay and had a long-time partner with whom he was not married; (2) whether the proponents of Proposition 8 have the right to appeal Walker's decision striking down Proposition 8 as unconstitutional when none of the state defendants chose to do so; and (3) whether, if Walker did not need to recuse himself and the proponents do have the right to appeal, Walker was correct that Proposition 8 violates Californians' due process and equal protection rights guaranteed in the US Constitution.
Donna Winter said:I didn't. But then I really am turning into a TOTAL SOUR OLD BAG
In SIMPLE terms PLEASE
WHOLE country? Meaning states who have a ban on same-sex marriage wouldn't have a choice?A higher court will rule on whether banning gay marriage is unconstitutional. One step closer to the US supreme court and marriage equality for the whole country.
Dark Carnival said:WHOLE country? Meaning states who have a ban on same-sex marriage wouldn't have a choice?
It's kind of inevitable you know.Sounds too good to actually happen..
It's kind of inevitable you know.
This has happened now.A higher court will rule on whether banning gay marriage is unconstitutional. One step closer to the US supreme court and marriage equality for the whole country.
California's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage violates the U.S. Constitution, a federal appeals court in San Francisco ruled Tuesday.
The decision by a three-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals is expected to be appealed, to either the full court or to the U.S. Supreme Court. But supporters of same-sex marriages cheered the decision when it was announced outside the courthouse Tuesday morning.
The 2-1 decision found the ban -- known as Proposition 8 -- "served no purpose, and had no effect, other than to lessen the status and human dignity of gays and lesbians in California, and to officially reclassify their relationship and families as inferior to those of opposite-sex couples." That violates the 14th Amendment's guarantee of equal protection under the law, the decision states.
The 9th Circuit, in a hearing just over a year ago, indicated it was inclined to toss out Proposition 8. The court also rejected arguments by supporters of the ban that now-retired federal judge Vaughn Walker -- who found Proposition 8 unconstitutional in 2010 -- should have recused himself and let another judge hear the case.
Walker disclosed after his retirement that he is gay and in a long-term relationship, leading Proposition 8 advocates to argue he should have stepped aside.
California's Supreme Court had allowed same-sex marriages in California. But Proposition 8 passed with 52% of the vote in 2008, bringing an end to the practice.
Prior to Walker's ruling, the California Supreme Court allowed that initiative to stand, saying it represented the will of the people.
Six states currently grant same-sex marriage licenses -- New York, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Iowa, Vermont and New Hampshire. The District of Columbia also does.
Five additional states recognize civil unions, providing state-level spousal rights to same-sex couples. They are Hawaii, Delaware, New Jersey, Illinois and Rhode Island.
Both sides of the dispute acknowledge the issue of same sex-marriage is likely headed to the U.S. Supreme Court, perhaps within the coming year.
Can someone (Madison) explain what's going on in the Supreme Court at the moment?
It was the era I'd blame. He has since slated it. Hindsight is beautiful in politics. But then its easy to say that when you live in a foreign country. I still think Thatcher was a cunt for Section 28.How could Clinton of all people bring this bill in in the first place? BLEURGH.
How could Clinton of all people bring this bill in in the first place? BLEURGH.
DOMA's dead!
No standing in the Prop 8 case.
Equal Marriage legal in California again but not country wide.
More states are falling one by one. A federal court in Texas of all places ruled their ban unconstitutional. Now more than 50% of the population are in states where it is technically legal (although in loads of them the rulings are stayed pending appeal).