Honestly, provided it hits a basic quality threshold and has been written structured in mind for how it could make for an effective 3 minute performance, I think the song itself and how immediately exciting it may or may not be is less important than having someone who can perform it well. Plenty of jury-powered top tens over the years that you wouldn't have felt much need to write home about hearing the studio version the first time.
Honestly, I think it's because we so rarely put the performer/performance first. There's no reason we can't deliver an entry that can hit the standard/type of result Douwe Bob - Slow Down delivered (left hand side top 10 contender off ~100+ points from the juries / a relatively modest ~30-40 point public haul). Basic professionalism and a bit of care and thought on the performance and a particular audience to be aiming to cater to can go a pretty long way, but we seem so rarely to ever start from those kinds of principles.But most of those jury top tens have managed to garner a decent televote- which is something we seem fairly incapable of doing.
Be that as it may, it's not as if it isn't one that has OBVIOUS JURY APPEAL!I find Rebecca Ferguson’s voice horrible
Is it like coriander
Didn't he play a big part in picking Sam Ryder? If anything we should be listening to him more!To be honest Scott Mills being wildly enthusiastic wouldn't give me any confidence, so I'm no more (or less) concerned than before.
It remains a terrible song but yes, the live performance was undeniableIf I recall many people were rather non-plussed by Space MAN until they heard it live and it became clear we were onto something good.
100%, and the clear increased level of commitment and investment in the entries we've had the last two years - albeit towards packages that, when it came down to it, couldn't really compensate for glaringly obvious weaknesses - is something I think it'd be a real shame to lose through a dissipating sense that Sam Ryder was just a one off and we can't really do well, because that level of investment and care is the sort of thing that could really help get entries that just get all the basics right to punch above their weight. Look how much went into turning Dizzy into a (deeply conceptually ill-advised) event performance!Being totally objective, I do think the last 3 entries are leaps better than anything that came 2012-2021, in that they actually sounded like contemporary UK songs that would be heard on radio(and indeed they got R1 support) and I would actively want to listen to them again. They also had infinitely better staging than anything that came in the 2010s. Whatever shortcomings the BBC still have concerning Eurovision, the foam trumpet days are behind them
The problem is if it doesn't translate live(as the last 2 didn't) then it really doesn't matter.
Germany last year(izak) has been mentioned here - very MOR in studio form, didn't leave much of an impression, but he carried the song, and come the final got decent jury support and ended up on the left hand side.
If I recall many people were rather non-plussed by Space MAN until they heard it live and it became clear we were onto something good.
No , it's not just about vocals but at the end of the day where the juries at concerned they play a massive part - can whoever our entrant is actually SELL and DELIVER whatever our song is?? Or we will have that all too familiar sinking feeling once the pre parties roll around and we see the live performances??
Absolutely.100%, and the clear increased level of commitment and investment in the entries we've had the last two years - albeit towards packages that, when it came down to it, couldn't really compensate for glaringly obvious weaknesses - is something I think it'd be a real shame to lose through a dissipating sense that Sam Ryder was just a one off and we can't really do well, because that level of investment and care is the sort of thing that could really help get entries that just get all the basics right to punch above their weight. Look how much went into turning Dizzy into a (deeply conceptually ill-advised) event performance!
There's basically no reason at all we couldn't be capable of delivering the kinds of entries Belgium, the Netherlands and Switzerland have managed to do well with over the last decade or so.
This site often has genuine inside information, although usually about Greece & Cyprus:
![]()
EXCLUSIVE: A girl band to represent the United Kingdom at Eurovision 2025 - Eurovision News | Music | Fun
As previously reported, the BBC has already selected its representative for Eurovision 2025, and in the coming weeks, both the artist and the song that will represent the United Kingdom in Basel are expected to be revealed. However, Eurovisionfun brings you exclusive first details! According to...eurovisionfun.com
Too modern! It's probably The NolansIT IS BANANARAMA AFTER ALL!
unperfect!If true I'd guess FLO but I'd obviously rather it was that now defunct Xenomania girlband we had a multi-page thread on.
They are on a US tour throughout April and May so it won't be them.If true I'd guess FLO but I'd obviously rather it was that now defunct Xenomania girlband we had a multi-page thread on.
I am sure the 7 people who bought tickets will accept a refund.They are on a US tour throughout April and May so it won't be them.
VANILLA!DESTINY’S CHILD!!
VANILLA!
CUTEBAD!
I mean it’s not like they’ve got anything else going onGIRLS ALOUD!
Honestly, if they sent Explosive or HotseatCUTEBAD!