probably more!I wonder what the number would be without that stunnin PERF on SNL...![]()
girl.Are those good streaming figures?
There is and it is the BRAVE era.There is no such thing as a J-Lo "imperial era". Sorry.
There is and it is the BRAVE era.
There is and it is the BRAVE era.
![]()
I'm enjoying the perfect symmetry of these gifs.
There is no such thing as a J-Lo "imperial era". Sorry.
No lies detected
Her so called imperial era was funded by Sony and part of their conspiracy to bring down Mariah
So really it could have been Christina Milian or Ashanti
Dunno about other women, but without men in suits, JLo definitely wouldn't be as successful. For better or for worse.
Dunno about other women, but without men in suits, JLo definitely wouldn't be as successful. For better or for worse.
And pointing that out is not misogynistic. It's just how their careers were formed.And neither would Mariah.
And here comes the BALANCED SIDE OF THE ARGUMENT.![]()
And pointing that out is not misogynistic. It's just how their careers were formed.
Nowadays, there are probably more women in suits making women's careers.
And my point (facetious as it was) was not about them being interchangeable. I mentioned them because they sang back-up on her records.You’re missing my point. @Suedehead basically called her interchangeable with Milan/ Ashanti, inferring they’re all faceless and just who Sony wanted to lead with.